NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 896
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 vs 3750
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 vs 307
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 vs 28933
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 vs 849.116
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 6326
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3710
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3354
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 6326
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3710
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3354
- Around 73% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 vs 2114
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 896 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 vs 3750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 vs 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 vs 28933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 vs 849.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 vs 2114 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 7539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 41907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 1843.045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 8926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 8062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 8926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 8062 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 3656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | TU117 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 524 | 267 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |