NVIDIA GeForce MX450 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1395 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1575 MHz versus 1485 MHz
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 100.8 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s
- 6.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10002 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Date de sortie | 1 Aug 2020 versus 2 Apr 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1575 MHz versus 1485 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 100.8 GTexel/s versus 95.04 GTexel/s |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10002 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 896
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7539 versus 3750
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 380 versus 307
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 41907 versus 28933
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1843.045 versus 849.116
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 versus 6326
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 versus 3710
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 versus 3354
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 versus 6326
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 versus 3710
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 versus 3354
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3656 versus 2114
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 896 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7539 versus 3750 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 380 versus 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41907 versus 28933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 versus 849.116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 versus 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 versus 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 versus 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 versus 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 versus 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 versus 2114 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 7539 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 380 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 41907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 1843.045 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 8926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 8062 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 12180 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 8926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 8062 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 3656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | TU117 |
Date de sortie | 1 Aug 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 524 | 267 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1575 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1024 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 100.8 GTexel/s | 95.04 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 4700 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.03 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10002 MHz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |