NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 628x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 66% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 23233
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 23233 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 896
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 vs 3750
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 307
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 849.116
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 6326
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 6326
- Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2777 vs 2114
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 896 |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 vs 3750 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 vs 849.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 vs 6326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 vs 6326 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 vs 2114 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 7986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 23233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | 1269.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 2777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 524 | 451 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $740.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 160.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2304 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
