NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA GeForce MX350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel/s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 5.7x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3750 vs 2807
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 235
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28933 vs 13562
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 4655
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 4655
- Around 70% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2114 vs 1247
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 vs 2807 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 vs 235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 vs 13562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 4655 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 vs 1247 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3750 | 2807 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28933 | 13562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 849.116 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2114 | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 524 | 654 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R7 340 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX
