NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX450

NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 667 MHz
3778.1x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 26.68 GTexel / s
Around 40% higher pipelines: 896 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
2x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3737 vs 3469
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29036 vs 10787
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 4750
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 3084
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 4750
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 3084

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Aug 2020 vs 19 July 2014
Core clock speed	1395 MHz vs 667 MHz
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel/s vs 26.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	896 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 65 Watt
Memory clock speed	10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3737 vs 3469
Geekbench - OpenCL	29036 vs 10787
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6326 vs 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354 vs 3084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6326 vs 4750
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354 vs 3084

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 304

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	384 vs 304
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 3710

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3737

3469

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

304

384

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29036

10787

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6326

4750

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3084

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6326

4750

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

3720

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

3084

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3737	3469
PassMark - G2D Mark	304	384
Geekbench - OpenCL	29036	10787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	849.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6326	4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	3084
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6326	4750
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710	3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	3084
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2065

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell
Code name	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	GM107
Launch date	1 Aug 2020	19 July 2014
Place in performance rating	546	544
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1575 MHz
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	667 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	896	640
Texture fill rate	100.8 GTexel/s	26.68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	65 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		853.8 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.03 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10002 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5, GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
GPU Boost
Optimus
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management