NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 1702.7x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29180 vs 15667
- Around 28% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2029 vs 1591
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 7 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29180 vs 15667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2029 vs 1591 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4453 vs 3732
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 602 vs 304
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 6326
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 6326
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4453 vs 3732 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 602 vs 304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 6326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3732 | 4453 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 602 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29180 | 15667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2029 | 1591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 515 | 523 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |