NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1266 MHz
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1480 MHz
  • 1702.7x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29180 vs 15667
  • Around 28% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2029 vs 1591
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 Aug 2020 vs 7 February 2017
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 1266 MHz
Boost clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Texture fill rate 100.8 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 896 vs 512
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Memory clock speed 10002 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 29180 vs 15667
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 vs 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 vs 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2029 vs 1591

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

  • Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4453 vs 3732
  • Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 602 vs 304
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 6326
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 6326
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 47 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4453 vs 3732
PassMark - G2D Mark 602 vs 304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6796 vs 6326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6796 vs 6326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3732
4453
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
304
602
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
29180
15667
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6326
6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3710
3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6326
6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3710
3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2029
1591
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX450 NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark 3732 4453
PassMark - G2D Mark 304 602
Geekbench - OpenCL 29180 15667
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6326 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6326 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2029 1591
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 245.081

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 GP107
Launch date 1 Aug 2020 7 February 2017
Place in performance rating 515 523
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $375
Price now $319.99
Value for money (0-100) 15.53

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1575 MHz 1480 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 1266 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 896 512
Texture fill rate 100.8 GTexel/s 59.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 47 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 3,300 million
Floating-point performance 1,894 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 145 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.03 GB/s 80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 10002 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

GPU Boost
Optimus