NVIDIA GeForce MX550 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 725.8x more texture fill rate: 42.24 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34265 vs 17466
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.448 vs 67.209
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1017.021 vs 799.414
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.996 vs 4.536
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.46 vs 30.523
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 587.99 vs 223.683
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2022 vs 25 October 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34265 vs 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 vs 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1017.021 vs 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.996 vs 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 vs 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 vs 223.683 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1065 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 396
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 4527
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 1065 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 396 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 4527 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 396 | 457 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4527 | 5029 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34265 | 17466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.448 | 67.209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1017.021 | 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.996 | 4.536 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.46 | 30.523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 587.99 | 223.683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX550 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 25 October 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 452 | 586 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 42.24 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.703 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 21.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 42.24 GTexel/s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 7008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 350
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
ATIRadeon X1650 GTO
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
AMDFirePro W7100
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000M
NVIDIAGeForce MX550 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Max-Q
