NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel/s
- 8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 10 nm
Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 256 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 10 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Launch date | 2021 vs 17 Dec 2021 |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU)
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.1 |
Code name | GA107 | |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 348 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | 1382 GFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | 691.2 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | 10.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 21.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compute units | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |