NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 1897.1x more texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 42 billion / sec
- 4.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 40 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 430
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 4121
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43499 vs 13143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 vs 26 March 2010 |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 42 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 430 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 vs 4121 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 vs 13143 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 430 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 4121 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 | 13143 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 274 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3320 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
Code name | GA107 | GF100 |
Launch date | 17 Dec 2021 | 26 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 348 | 742 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $71.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 250 Watt |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,345.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |