NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1379 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14149 vs 9878
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 436
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70668 vs 37928
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.337 vs 214.123
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3131.344 vs 2293.496
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.852 vs 12.704
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 692.9
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 14915
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 14915
- Around 53% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7489 vs 4887
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1379 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14149 vs 9878 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 436 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70668 vs 37928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 vs 214.123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 vs 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 vs 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 vs 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 14915 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 vs 4887 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1920
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.717 vs 135.923
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 7442
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 6714
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 7442
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 6714
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1920 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 vs 135.923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 vs 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 vs 6714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14149 | 9878 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 436 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70668 | 37928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 214.123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 2293.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 12.704 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 139.717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 692.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 8048 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 14915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 8902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 8048 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 | 4887 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU106 | GP104 |
Launch date | 7 January 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 150 | 221 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | 1379 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 2048 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 176.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |