NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1185 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 28x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11609 vs 8183
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76209 vs 56040
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 168.08 vs 141.474
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 13.132
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1001.496 vs 799.933
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 10141
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3713
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 10141
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3713
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11609 vs 8183 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76209 vs 56040 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2304
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 780 vs 472
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 1935.102
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.973 vs 111.023
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 8055
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 8055
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 780 vs 472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 vs 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 vs 111.023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 8055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 8055 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11609 | 8183 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 | 780 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76209 | 56040 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6796 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 189 | 192 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Design | reference | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $849 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 3x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 277 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |