NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1185 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 vs 70535
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 6316
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 8390
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 6316
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 8390
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 vs 70535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 8390 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 885 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 8055
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 8055
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 8055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 8055 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11748 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | 70535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 27566 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 178 | 165 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
