NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M485X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 2386x more texture fill rate: 220.8 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M485X
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M485X |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8352 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3661 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 M485X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 234 | 272 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 220.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.13 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.066 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Enduro |