NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 vs 10205
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 487
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 16828
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 16828
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 23 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 vs 10205 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 487 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 16828 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3359
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3359
- 795.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5570 vs 7
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5570 vs 7 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 | 10205 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 15109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 15109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8054 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 5570 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | N18E-G0 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 23 April 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 133 | 117 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1455 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1536 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | |
Transistor count | 13.6 B | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6144 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |