NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18220 vs 12354
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 601
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 18604
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 18604
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18220 vs 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 18604 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3359
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3359
- 1058.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7410 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7410 vs 7 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18220 | 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 601 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99314 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 7410 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 136 | 138 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1215 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 13.6 B | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |