NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1304 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1442 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 235 Watt
- 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18811 vs 16374
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 847
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 vs 84757
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 vs 25.191
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 vs 144.928
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 vs 1056.078
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 16640
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 16640
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1304 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1442 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18811 vs 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 vs 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 vs 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 vs 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 vs 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 vs 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 16640 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2944
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.937 vs 326.494
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 vs 3938.377
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 vs 6966
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 vs 6293
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 vs 6966
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 vs 6293
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2944 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 vs 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 vs 3938.377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 vs 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 vs 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 vs 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 vs 6293 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18811 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 | 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10970 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP100 |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 | 1 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 98 | 88 |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 3584 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,329 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 322.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 921.6 GB / s |