NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 versus NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and NVIDIA Quadro GP100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1304 MHz
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1442 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 235 Watt
- 9.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1430 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18814 versus 16374
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 847
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 versus 84757
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 versus 25.191
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 versus 144.928
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 versus 1056.078
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 16640
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 16640
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 versus 1 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1304 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1442 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 235 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1430 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18814 versus 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 versus 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 versus 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 versus 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 versus 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 16640 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GP100
- Environ 22% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2944
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 355.937 versus 326.494
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4858.771 versus 3938.377
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13211 versus 6966
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 22133 versus 6293
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13211 versus 6966
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 22133 versus 6293
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 2944 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 355.937 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4858.771 versus 3938.377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13211 versus 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 22133 versus 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13211 versus 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 22133 versus 6293 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GP100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18814 | 16374 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 | 84757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | 355.937 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | 4858.771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | 25.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | 144.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | 1056.078 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 22133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 16640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 13211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 22133 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10966 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Quadro GP100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU104 | GP100 |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 98 | 88 |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 1442 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1304 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 3584 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 235 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 15,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 10,329 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 322.8 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 921.6 GB / s |