NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 264.5x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 vs 1797.792
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 14.071
• 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 vs 26.444
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3638
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3344
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3638
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3344

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 712 MHz
• Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1057 MHz
• Around 19% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 2048
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14690 vs 6757
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 403
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55343 vs 50603
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 vs 165.993
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 745.481
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 15760
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 15760
• Around 38% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6812 vs 4932

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6757 14690
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	403 875
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50603 55343
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.993 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1980.866 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.641 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.641 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	745.481 1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4932 6812

Compare specifications (specs)