NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 316.3x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50648 vs 39571
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 12.895
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 13738
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3356
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 13738
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 21 March 2015 |
| Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50648 vs 39571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 vs 12.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 vs 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 vs 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11770 vs 6921
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 405
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 207.14 vs 165.993
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2593.621 vs 1980.866
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 vs 135.641
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 768.171 vs 745.481
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 988 MHz vs 712 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11770 vs 6921 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 405 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 vs 165.993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 vs 1980.866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 vs 135.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 768.171 vs 745.481 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6921 | 11770 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | 725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 50648 | 39571 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 207.14 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 2593.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 12.895 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 145.003 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 768.171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 13738 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 415 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GA107 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 21 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 249 | 248 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,199.99 | |
| Price now | $2,825 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 988 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 8,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 6612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
