NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 14496
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3361
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 14496
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 27 May 2019 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 vs 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 vs 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3361 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11130 vs 6755
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 vs 402
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64074 vs 50608
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11130 vs 6755 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 vs 402 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64074 vs 50608 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6755 | 11130 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 511 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50608 | 64074 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4932 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA107 | N19E-Q1 |
Launch date | 2021 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 242 | 240 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 945 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | 198.7 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.72 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | 6.359 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2048 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 198.7 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | Large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |