NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 14496
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3719
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3361
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 14496
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3719
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3361
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 27 May 2019
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 vs 3361

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Around 33% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 712 MHz
  • Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1057 MHz
  • 2.9x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
  • Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11130 vs 6755
  • Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 vs 402
  • Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64074 vs 50608
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 945 MHz vs 712 MHz
Boost clock speed 1380 MHz vs 1057 MHz
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2304 vs 2048
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 11130 vs 6755
PassMark - G2D Mark 511 vs 402
Geekbench - OpenCL 64074 vs 50608

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6755
11130
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
402
511
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
50608
64074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
3361
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark 6755 11130
PassMark - G2D Mark 402 511
Geekbench - OpenCL 50608 64074
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 165.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1980.866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 14.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 135.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 745.481
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4932

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Turing
Code name GA107 N19E-Q1
Launch date 2021 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 242 240
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1057 MHz 1380 MHz
Core clock speed 712 MHz 945 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2048 2304
Pixel fill rate 42.28 GPixel/s 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 67.65 GTexel/s 198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP
Laptop size Large

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.1
OpenCL 3.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready