NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 14496
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3719
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3361
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 14496
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3719
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3361

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2021 vs 27 May 2019
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15760 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8923 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8045 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15760 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8923 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8045 vs 3361

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Around 33% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 712 MHz
Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1057 MHz
2.9x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11152 vs 6838
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 vs 405
Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64410 vs 50633

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	945 MHz vs 712 MHz
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz vs 1057 MHz
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 67.65 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2304 vs 2048
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11152 vs 6838
PassMark - G2D Mark	517 vs 405
Geekbench - OpenCL	64410 vs 50633

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6838

11152

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

405

517

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

50633

64410

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15760

14496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8923

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8045

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15760

14496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8923

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8045

3361

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark	6838	11152
PassMark - G2D Mark	405	517
Geekbench - OpenCL	50633	64410
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	150.439
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1702.955
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	12.516
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	124.224
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15760	14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8923	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8045	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15760	14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8923	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8045	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4915

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Code name	GA107	N19E-Q1
Launch date	2021	27 May 2019
Place in performance rating	241	238
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1057 MHz	1380 MHz
Core clock speed	712 MHz	945 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	67.65 GFLOPS (1:64)	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.329 TFLOPS (1:1)	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.329 TFLOPS	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	2304
Pixel fill rate	42.28 GPixel/s	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	67.65 GTexel/s	198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	80 Watt
Transistor count		10800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
Laptop size		Large
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.1
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready