NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 237.2x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50603 vs 40433
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 13107
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3354
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 13107
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 5 March 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50603 vs 40433 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 vs 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 712 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1057 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11883 vs 6757
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 691 vs 403
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 988 MHz vs 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1057 MHz |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11883 vs 6757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 691 vs 403 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6757 | 11883 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 403 | 691 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50603 | 40433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4932 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GA107 | GM200 |
Launch date | 2021 | 5 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 239 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | 988 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |