NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
237.2x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50608 vs 40181
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 13107
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3354
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 13107
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3354

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2021 vs 5 March 2016
Texture fill rate	67.65 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	50608 vs 40181
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15760 vs 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8923 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8045 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15760 vs 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8923 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8045 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Around 39% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 712 MHz
Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1057 MHz
Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
4.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11883 vs 6755
Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 691 vs 402

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	988 MHz vs 712 MHz
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz vs 1057 MHz
Pipelines	3072 vs 2048
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11883 vs 6755
PassMark - G2D Mark	691 vs 402

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6755

11883

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

402

691

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

50608

40181

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15760

13107

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8923

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8045

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15760

13107

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8923

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8045

3354

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark	6755	11883
PassMark - G2D Mark	402	691
Geekbench - OpenCL	50608	40181
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	165.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1980.866
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	135.641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	745.481
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15760	13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8923	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8045	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15760	13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8923	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8045	3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4932

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GA107	GM200
Launch date	2021	5 March 2016
Place in performance rating	242	239
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$4,999
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1057 MHz	1114 MHz
Core clock speed	712 MHz	988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	67.65 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.329 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.329 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	3072
Pixel fill rate	42.28 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	67.65 GTexel/s	285.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	250 Watt
Floating-point performance		6,844 gflops
Transistor count		8,000 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	6612 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5