NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 237.2x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 50572 vs 39431
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 13107
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3715
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3354
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 13107
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3715
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3354
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 5 March 2016
Texture fill rate 67.65 GTexel/s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 50572 vs 39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 vs 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 vs 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 712 MHz
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1057 MHz
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4.4x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11869 vs 6870
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 695 vs 413
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 988 MHz vs 712 MHz
Boost clock speed 1114 MHz vs 1057 MHz
Pipelines 3072 vs 2048
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 11869 vs 6870
PassMark - G2D Mark 695 vs 413

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6870
11869
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
413
695
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
50572
39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15760
13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8923
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8045
3354
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark 6870 11869
PassMark - G2D Mark 413 695
Geekbench - OpenCL 50572 39431
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15760 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8923 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8045 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15760 13107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8923 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8045 3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4899

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Maxwell 2.0
Code name GA107 GM200
Launch date 2021 5 March 2016
Place in performance rating 192 234
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $4,999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1057 MHz 1114 MHz
Core clock speed 712 MHz 988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.329 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2048 3072
Pixel fill rate 42.28 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 67.65 GTexel/s 285.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops
Transistor count 8,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 192 GB/s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) 6612 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5