NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 195.7x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 vs 142.691
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1980.866 vs 1729.558
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 12.693
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.641 vs 111.376
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 13339
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8923 vs 3709
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3353
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 13339
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8923 vs 3709
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

• Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 712 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1057 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12920 vs 6755
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 797 vs 402
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71298 vs 50608
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1396.172 vs 745.481

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6755 12920
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	402 797
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	50608 71298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	165.993 142.691
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1980.866 1729.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.641 12.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.641 111.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	745.481 1396.172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 13339
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15760 13339
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8923 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8045 3353

Compare specifications (specs)