NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1057 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 251.7x more texture fill rate: 67.65 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1050 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.993 vs 155.307
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.641 vs 12.49
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15760 vs 8673
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8045 vs 3361
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15760 vs 8673
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8045 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 24 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 vs 155.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 vs 12.49 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 vs 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 vs 3361 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9576 vs 6789
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 402
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 vs 1980.866
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.089 vs 135.641
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 857.575 vs 745.481
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5170 vs 4932
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9576 vs 6789 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 vs 402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 vs 1980.866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 vs 135.641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 857.575 vs 745.481 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 vs 8923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 vs 8923 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 vs 4932 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6789 | 9576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 796 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 50633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.993 | 155.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1980.866 | 3431.249 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.641 | 12.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.641 | 153.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 745.481 | 857.575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15760 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8923 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8045 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15760 | 8673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8923 | 8925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8045 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4932 | 5170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Fiji |
Launch date | 2021 | 24 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 237 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1057 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 712 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 67.65 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.329 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.28 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 67.65 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 275 Watt |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,602 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Transistor count | 8,900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 191 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |