NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 451.9x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 175x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 887
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 27 May 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1733 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 887 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 vs 12873
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 vs 49885
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 vs 12873 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 vs 49885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 887 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 15578 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 55548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1560 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA107 | GP104 |
Launch date | 2022 | 27 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 281 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 180 Watt |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 500 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 2-slot |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |