NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 2887.1x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 350x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 521
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 3901
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 11526
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2022 vs 18 February 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 640 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 5.4 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 521 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 vs 3901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 vs 11526 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 90 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 521 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 3901 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
Code name | GA107 | GM107 |
Launch date | 2022 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 88 | 707 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 60 Watt |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 5.4 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |