NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 2667.1x more texture fill rate: 125.3 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 213
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 2259
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 49885 vs 9584
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2022 vs 17 May 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 vs 213 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 vs 2259 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 vs 9584 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 90 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 942 | 213 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12873 | 2259 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 49885 | 9584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA107 | GP108 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 17 May 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 88 | 875 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 125.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.018 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.68 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 125.3 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 48.06 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
