NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 945 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1380 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 942 vs 498
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12873 vs 10967

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

• Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 125.3 GTexel/s
• Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 90 Watt
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 49885

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	942 498
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12873 10967
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	49885 63532

Compare specifications (specs)