NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1190 MHz
2216.3x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
3.2x more pipelines: 4864 vs 1536
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1600 MHz
3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 6581
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 773
4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 27108
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 8931
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 8931

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Dec 2020 vs 1 February 2018
Core clock speed	1410 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz vs 1190 MHz
Texture fill rate	253.1 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4864 vs 1536
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	20394 vs 6581
PassMark - G2D Mark	989 vs 773
Geekbench - OpenCL	109075 vs 27108
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478 vs 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478 vs 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 200 Watt
Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2911 vs 2671

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 200 Watt
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2911 vs 2671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

20394

6581

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

989

773

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

109075

27108

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

8931

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

8931

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3351

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2671

2911

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
PassMark - G3D Mark	20394	6581
PassMark - G2D Mark	989	773
Geekbench - OpenCL	109075	27108
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	323.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4756.579
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	35.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	150.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1474.189
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478	8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478	8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2671	2911

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 4.0
Code name	GA104	Polaris 22
Launch date	1 Dec 2020	1 February 2018
Launch price (MSRP)	$399
Place in performance rating	104	325
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	1190 MHz
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	1063 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	253.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4864	1536
Pixel fill rate	133.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	253.1 GTexel/s	114.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	17400 million
Floating-point performance		3,656 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	IGP
Length	242 mm (9.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin
Width	112 mm (4.4 inches)
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	204.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Shared memory		0