NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 1253x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 4864 vs 1920
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
  • 218.8x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 8 GB/s
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 13504
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 847
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 47476
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 150.951
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1718.593
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 12.283
  • 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 28.289
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 710.366
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 13765
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3691
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3340
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 13765
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3691
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3340
  • 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1082
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 vs 10 June 2016
Texture fill rate 253.1 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
Pipelines 4864 vs 1920
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm vs 16 nm
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 8 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 20394 vs 13504
PassMark - G2D Mark 989 vs 847
Geekbench - OpenCL 109075 vs 47476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 323.141 vs 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4756.579 vs 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 35.311 vs 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 150.943 vs 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1474.189 vs 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27478 vs 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27478 vs 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 vs 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2671 vs 1082

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1410 MHz
  • Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1665 MHz
  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 200 Watt
Core clock speed 1506 MHz vs 1410 MHz
Boost clock speed 1683 MHz vs 1665 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 200 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
20394
13504
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
989
847
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
109075
47476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
323.141
150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4756.579
1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
35.311
12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
150.943
28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1474.189
710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27478
13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27478
13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2671
1082
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark 20394 13504
PassMark - G2D Mark 989 847
Geekbench - OpenCL 109075 47476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 323.141 150.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4756.579 1718.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 35.311 12.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 150.943 28.289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1474.189 710.366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27478 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27478 13765
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2671 1082

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Ampere Pascal
Code name GA104 GP104
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 10 June 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $379
Place in performance rating 104 288
Type Desktop Desktop
Price now $359.99
Value for money (0-100) 45.72

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1665 MHz 1683 MHz
Core clock speed 1410 MHz 1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 8 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 16.20 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4864 1920
Pixel fill rate 133.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 253.1 GTexel/s 202.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million 7,200 million
CUDA cores 1920
Floating-point performance 6,463 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 94 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 242 mm (9.5 inches) 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt 500 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 12-pin 8-pin
Width 112 mm (4.4 inches) 2-slot
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 256 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 8 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GPU Boost
ShadowWorks
SLI
Virtual Reality