NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 1253x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 4864 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- 218.8x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 8 GB/s
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 13504
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 847
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 47476
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 150.951
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1718.593
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 12.283
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 28.289
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 710.366
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 13765
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3340
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 13765
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3340
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1082
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 10 June 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 13504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1082 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 200 Watt
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 13504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1082 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 10 June 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $379 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 288 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-slot |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |