NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 1920
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- 218.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 13504
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 847
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 47476
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 150.951
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1718.593
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 12.283
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 28.289
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 710.366
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 13765
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3340
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 13765
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3340
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1082
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 10 June 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 1920 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 13504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1082 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 200 Watt
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 13504 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 47476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1082 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 10 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $379 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 288 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 500 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-slot |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |