NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 12900
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 807
• Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 61100
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 208.608
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 2573.643
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 16.447
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 145.886
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 926.614
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 16952
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 16952
• 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1061

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 200 Watt
• 6.9x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20394 12900
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	989 807
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109075 61100
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	323.141 208.608
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4756.579 2573.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.311 16.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.943 145.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1474.189 926.614
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2671 1061

Compare specifications (specs)