NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 12900
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 807
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 61100
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 208.608
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 2573.643
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 16.447
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 145.886
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 926.614
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 16952
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 16952
- 2.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1061
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 22 February 2019 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 12900 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 807 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 61100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 208.608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 2573.643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 16.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 145.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 926.614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1061 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 6.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 12900 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 807 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 61100 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 208.608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 2573.643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 16.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 145.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 926.614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 16952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1061 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU116 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 22 February 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $279 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 221 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |