NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 10496 vs 4864
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26817 vs 20549
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 996
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188320 vs 107152
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 311.869
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 4657.322
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 35.311
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 125
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1477.456
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 27478
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 27478
- Around 71% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19877 vs 11652
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 4864 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26817 vs 20549 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 188320 vs 107152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 4657.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 27478 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19877 vs 11652 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 | 26817 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 | 1051 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107152 | 188320 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | 732.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | 7585.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 63.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | 247.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 2441.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 | 19877 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA104 | GA102 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $1499 |
Place in performance rating | 101 | 40 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4864 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Triple-slot |
Height | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |