NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 1% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Etwa 75% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Etwa 44% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3354 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Etwa 2% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 2.2x mehr Texturfüllrate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- 2.2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 10496 vs 4864
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 vs 20394
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 989
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 109075
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 323.141
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 4756.579
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 vs 35.311
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 vs 150.943
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1474.189
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 27478
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 27478
- Etwa 92% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 vs 2671
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10496 vs 4864 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26668 vs 20394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 vs 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.614 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 209.424 vs 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 27478 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 vs 2671 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 26668 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 1060 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 191142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 690.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 7585.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 62.614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 209.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 2441.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 33398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 5118 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $1499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 46 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 350 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | 750 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Triple-slot |
Höhe | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |