NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

versus

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1395 MHz
Environ 75% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 350 Watt
Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	1 Dec 2020 versus 1 Sep 2020
Vitesse du noyau	1410 MHz versus 1395 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt versus 350 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 versus 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 versus 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 versus 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 versus 3354

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1665 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
2.2x plus de pipelines: 10496 versus 4864
3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26668 versus 20394
Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 versus 989
Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 versus 109075
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 versus 323.141
Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 versus 4756.579
Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.614 versus 35.311
Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 209.424 versus 150.943
Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 versus 1474.189
Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 27478
Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 27478
Environ 92% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 versus 2671

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	1695 MHz versus 1665 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	556.0 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
Pipelines	10496 versus 4864
Taille de mémore maximale	24 GB versus 8 GB
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	26668 versus 20394
PassMark - G2D Mark	1060 versus 989
Geekbench - OpenCL	191142 versus 109075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	690.619 versus 323.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7585.258 versus 4756.579
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	62.614 versus 35.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	209.424 versus 150.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	2441.384 versus 1474.189
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398 versus 27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398 versus 27478
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	5118 versus 2671

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

20394

26668

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

989

1060

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

109075

191142

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

323.141

690.619

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4756.579

7585.258

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

35.311

62.614

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

150.943

209.424

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1474.189

2441.384

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

33398

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27478

33398

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3354

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2671

5118

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G3D Mark	20394	26668
PassMark - G2D Mark	989	1060
Geekbench - OpenCL	109075	191142
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	323.141	690.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4756.579	7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	35.311	62.614
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	150.943	209.424
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1474.189	2441.384
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	27478	33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	27478	33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3354
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2671	5118

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	Ampere
Nom de code	GA104	GA102
Date de sortie	1 Dec 2020	1 Sep 2020
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$399	$1499
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	104	46
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1665 MHz	1695 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	1410 MHz	1395 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	253.1 GFLOPS (1:64)	556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS (1:1)	35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	16.20 TFLOPS	35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4864	10496
Pixel fill rate	133.2 GPixel/s	189.8 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	253.1 GTexel/s	556.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt	350 Watt
Compte de transistor	17400 million	28300 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Facteur de forme	Dual-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Longeur	242 mm (9.5 inches)	313 mm (12.3 inches)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	350 Watt	750 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 12-pin	1x 12-pin
Largeur	112 mm (4.4 inches)	Triple-slot
Hauteur		138 mm (5.4 inches)
Soutien API
DirectX	12.2	12.2
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	8 GB	24 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	448 GB/s	936.2 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 bit	384 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)	1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR6X