NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 4275.3x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 9.5x more pipelines: 4864 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 4500
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 590
- 7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 15667
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 71.86
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 832.248
- 8.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 4.039
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 65.117
- 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 245.081
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 6796
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 6796
- Around 68% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1591
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 7 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1591 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA104 | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $375 |
Place in performance rating | 104 | 517 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |