NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 11% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Etwa 13% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 4275.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 9.5x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4864 vs 512
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 4500
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 590
- 7x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 15667
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 71.86
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 832.248
- 8.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 4.039
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 65.117
- 6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 245.081
- 4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 6796
- 4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 6796
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1591
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 7 February 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 vs 512 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1591 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- 4.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 47 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2.9x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1591 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Pascal |
Codename | GA104 | GP107 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $375 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 517 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Jetzt kaufen | $319.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 47 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 3,300 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,894 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 145 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | None |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |