NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1266 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s
- 9.5x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 512
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 4500
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 590
- 7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 15667
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 71.86
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 832.248
- 8.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 4.039
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 65.117
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 245.081
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 6796
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 6796
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1591
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 7 February 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1266 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 512 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1591 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 47 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 4500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 245.081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 6796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1591 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 7 February 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $375 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 517 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $319.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 47 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 3,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,894 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 145 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |