NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 912.7x more texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 277.3 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2048
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 12640
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 673
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 52508
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 223.558
• Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 2698.914
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 14.206
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 140.845
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 927.006
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 15489
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3409
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3077
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 15489
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3409
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3077
• 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1330

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000

• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 200 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
• 5.2x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20394 12640
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	989 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109075 52508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	323.141 223.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4756.579 2698.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.311 14.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.943 140.845
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1474.189 927.006
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3077
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 15489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3409
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3077
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2671 1330

Compare specifications (specs)