NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 12640
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 673
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 52508
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 223.558
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 2698.914
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 14.206
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 140.845
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 927.006
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 15489
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3077
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 15489
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3077
- 2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1330
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 1 October 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 277.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 2048 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 12640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 52508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1330 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- 5.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 12640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 52508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1330 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $2,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 247 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $1,699.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.38 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 9016 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |