NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 85209
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 232.933
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 3728.135
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 24.872
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 136.223
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 1011.233
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 20206
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 20206
- Around 43% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1873
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4864 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 85209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 232.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 3728.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 24.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 1011.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1873 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 200 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 85209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 232.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 3728.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 24.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1011.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 13 November 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $899 |
| Place in performance rating | 104 | 211 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4864 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation
