NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 40% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Etwa 8% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Etwa 14% höhere Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
- 2.1x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4864 vs 2304
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Etwa 8% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 85209
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 232.933
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 3728.135
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 24.872
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 136.223
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 1011.233
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 20206
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 20206
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 1873
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 13 November 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 vs 2304 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 85209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 232.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 3728.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 24.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 136.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 1011.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 1873 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Etwa 25% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 160 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 85209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 232.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 3728.135 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 24.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 136.223 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1011.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1873 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Turing |
Codename | GA104 | TU104 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 13 November 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $899 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 211 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
GCN-Generierung | Quadro RTX | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 160 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 13600 million |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |