NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 14% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 2304
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 8% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 85209
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 232.933
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 3728.135
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 24.872
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 136.223
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 1011.233
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 20206
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 20206
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1873
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 13 November 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 4864 versus 2304 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 85209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 232.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 3728.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 24.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 1011.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1873 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 200 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 85209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 232.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 3728.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 24.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1011.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1873 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 13 November 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $899 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 211 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 4864 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation
