NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 18544
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 785
• Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 74179
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 19571
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 19571

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 323.141
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 4756.579
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 35.311
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 150.943
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1474.189
• Around 31% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3503 vs 2671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20394 18544
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	989 785
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	109075 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	323.141 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4756.579 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.311 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	150.943 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1474.189 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2671 3503

Compare specifications (specs)