NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20546 vs 18872
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 791
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107110 vs 74179
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 19571
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 19571

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 317.505
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 4829.953
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 35.056
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 137.972
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1480.723
• Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 11654

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	20546 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	996 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	107110 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	317.505 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4829.953 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.056 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	137.972 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1480.723 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27478 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	11654 13943

Compare specifications (specs)