NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Etwa 25% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20549 vs 18872
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 791
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107152 vs 74179
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 19571
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 19571
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 vs 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107152 vs 74179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3357 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Etwa 2% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- 8x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 311.869
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 4657.322
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 35.311
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 125
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1477.456
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 11652
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 vs 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 vs 4657.322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 vs 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 vs 1477.456 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 vs 11652 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107152 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 | 13943 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Turing |
Codename | GA104 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $6,299 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 101 | 112 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 |