NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 10180
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 751
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 55838
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 178.014
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 1961.932
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 11.169
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 109.29
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 787.025
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 13569
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 13569
- 5.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 22 Nov 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 55838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 178.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 109.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 787.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 vs 352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 170 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 55838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 178.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 109.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 787.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU116 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 22 Nov 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Place in performance rating | 134 | 283 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |