NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1777 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 199.0 GTexel/s versus 138.0 GTexel/s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 3584 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 versus 10180
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 versus 751
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 versus 55838
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 versus 178.014
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 versus 1961.932
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 versus 11.169
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 versus 109.29
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 versus 787.025
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 versus 13569
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 versus 13569
- 5.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 versus 352
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 22 Nov 2019 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s versus 138.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 1280 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 versus 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 versus 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 versus 55838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 versus 178.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 versus 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 versus 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 versus 109.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 versus 787.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 versus 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 versus 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3715 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 versus 352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1320 MHz
- Environ 70% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 170 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1320 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 170 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 10180 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 55838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 178.014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 1961.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 11.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 109.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 787.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 13569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 352 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU116 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 22 Nov 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 134 | 283 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 6600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 9 inches (229 mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Dual-slot |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 360 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |