NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 928
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 174.185
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 20 September 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 174.185 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 vs 17107
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 vs 88251
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 vs 299.369
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 vs 4021.382
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 vs 28.778
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1152.664
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 22495
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 22495
- Around 80% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3537 vs 1961
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 vs 17107 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 vs 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 vs 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 vs 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 vs 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 vs 1961 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 21601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 928 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 3537 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA106 | TU102 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 134 | 91 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |