NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1777 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 47% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 versus 928
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 versus 174.185
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 versus 928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 versus 174.185 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 1320 MHz
- 7.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 versus 17107
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 versus 88251
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 299.369
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 4021.382
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 versus 28.778
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1152.664
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 22495
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 22495
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3537 versus 1961
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 1320 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 versus 17107 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 versus 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 versus 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 versus 1961 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 21601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 928 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 3537 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 134 | 91 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 360 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |