NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1320 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 72% higher boost clock speed: 1777 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 10117
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 497
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 57885
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 229.393
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 2082.931
- Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 16.561
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 134.68
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 599.217
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 16098
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 16098
- 4.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 vs 469
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 229.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 599.217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 16098 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 vs 469 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 10117 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 229.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 2082.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 16.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 134.68 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 599.217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 16098 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 469 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA106 | GA106 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 11 May 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Place in performance rating | 134 | 276 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1320 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3584 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |